4.2 Review

A systematic review of the effectiveness of wrist manipulative therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 528-535

Publisher

HANLEY & BELFUS-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.10.002

Keywords

Lateral Epicondylitis; Manipulative therapy; Wrist manipulation; Systematic Review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review aimed to determine if wrist joint manipulations are effective in improving pain, grip strength, ROM, and functional outcome in patients with lateral epicondylitis. The review of four studies found that wrist manipulations had a positive effect on pain in the short term.
Study Design: Systematic review.Introduction: Several treatment methods treat lateral epicondylitis, but there is no consensus regarding the most effective method. Research has suggested that joint mobilizations may help recover patients with lateral epicondylitis.Purpose of the Study: To determine if wrist joint manipulations effectively improve pain, grip strength, ROM, and functional outcome in adults with lateral epicondylitis. Methods: Searches were performed in 6 databases to identify relevant clinical trials. Three reviewers in-dependently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality using the PEDro scale. Standard data were extracted and summarized.Results: A total of 4 studies met the inclusion criteria. A best-evidence synthesis was used to summarize the results. The included studies found effectiveness in favor of wrist manipulations given for at least 3 weeks to reduce pain in lateral epicondylitis against comparison groups comprising ultrasound, laser, friction massage, and exercises. Functional outcomes varied considerably among studies. Grip strength showed varied results, and no effect was seen on wrist ROM. Conclusion: The evidence is convincing that wrist joint manipulations positively affect pain in the short term, compared to comparison groups in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Future high-quality studies are recommended. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available