4.7 Review

Diagnostic criteria and endoscopic and histological findings of autoimmune gastritis in Japan

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 185-195

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-022-01954-9

Keywords

Autoimmune gastritis; Type A gastritis; Diagnostic criteria; Early-stage AIG; Corpus-predominant atrophy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Japanese diagnostic criteria for autoimmune gastritis (AIG) were established by the Study Group, including endoscopic or histological findings and positive gastric autoantibodies. Early-stage AIG diagnosis only requires histological confirmation and gastric autoantibody positivity. The newly proposed criteria allow for more accurate and early diagnosis of AIG, helping to stratify patients into high-risk groups and establish a surveillance system, but issues regarding endoscopic findings and insurance coverage need attention.
The Japanese diagnostic criteria for autoimmune gastritis (AIG) were established by the Study Group on the establishment of diagnostic criteria for type A gastritis, which is related to a workshop associated with the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) and the Committee of AIG Research Group (CARP). The criteria were set as follows: the cases of confirmed diagnosis are patients in whom either the endoscopic or histological findings, or both, meet the requirements for AIG and who are confirmed to be positive for gastric autoantibodies (either anti-parietal cell or anti-intrinsic factor antibodies, or both). The presentation of endoscopic findings of early-stage AIG in the diagnostic criteria was withheld owing to the need for further accumulation and characterization of endoscopic clinical data. Therefore, diagnosis of early-stage AIG only requires histological confirmation and gastric autoantibody positivity. Suspected cases are patients in whom either the endoscopic or histological findings, or both, meet only the requirements for AIG. Histological findings only meet the requirements for early stage. AIG has been underdiagnosed in the past, but our study group's newly proposed diagnostic criteria will enable a more accurate and early diagnosis of AIG. The criteria can be used to stratify patients into various high-risk groups for gastric tumors and pernicious anemia. They would allow the establishment of an appropriate surveillance system in the coming years. Nevertheless, issues such as establishing the endoscopic findings of early-stage AIG and obtaining Japanese insurance coverage for gastric autoantibody tests require attention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available