4.6 Article

Studying iodine intake of Portuguese children school meals

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.105061

Keywords

Iodine; School -age children; ICP-MS; Adequate intake; Tolerable upper intake level; Food analysis; Data quality; Prediction model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the iodine content of school meals in Portuguese children and found that adding iodized salt to at least one main meal per day is sufficient to meet the recommended daily iodine intake. The main sources of iodine are dairy products and fish.
Iodine is an essential trace element, and its nutritional importance is well established. The iodine content of school meals of Portuguese children aged between 6 and 10 years (collected in the metropolitan area of Lisbon) was analyzed by ICP-MS. The samples were cooked with and without iodized salt and additionally some com-plementary foods were purchased as supplements to the main meals or to the other meal along the day. The results report six meals per day and they suggest that at least one main meals (lunch or dinner) prepared with iodized salt is enough to reach the recommended daily iodine intake (AI), 90 mu g/day, not exceeding the tolerable upper intake (UL) level of 300 mu g/day. When both main meals are cooked without iodized salt, 11 % of the hypotheses present an iodine content less than 90 mu g/day. However, when lunch and dinner are prepared with iodized salt, 1 % exceeds the value of the UL. The food groups with the highest levels of iodine are daily products and fish. These results presuppose a balanced diet without any dietary restrictions. So, for ideological or medical reasons, special attention must be paid to diets with some limitations, such as vegetarian, lactose or high content of proteins free diets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available