4.7 Article

When does an impacting drop stop bouncing?

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 958, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2023.55

Keywords

drops

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using numerical simulations, we investigate how viscous stresses and gravity inhibit drop rebound by opposing capillarity. We find that the initial spreading stage can be decoupled from the later retraction and take-off, and propose a criterion for the transition from bouncing to non-bouncing regime. The criterion is in excellent agreement with the numerical results. We also elucidate the mechanisms of bouncing inhibition in the heavy and viscous drop limiting regimes.
Non-wetting substrates allow impacting liquid drops to spread, recoil and take-off, provided they are not too heavy (Biance et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 554, 2006, pp. 47-66) or too viscous (Jha et al., Soft Matt., vol. 16, no. 31, 2020, pp. 7270-7273). In this article, using direct numerical simulations with the volume of fluid method, we investigate how viscous stresses and gravity oppose capillarity to inhibit drop rebound. Close to the bouncing to non-bouncing transition, we evidence that the initial spreading stage can be decoupled from the later retraction and take-off, allowing us to understand the rebound as a process converting the surface energy of the spread liquid into kinetic energy. Drawing an analogy with coalescence-induced jumping, we propose a criterion for the transition from the bouncing to the non-bouncing regime, namely by the condition Oh(c) + Bo(c) similar to 1, where Oh(c) and Bo(c) are the Ohnesorge number and Bond number at the transition, respectively. This criterion is in excellent agreement with the numerical results. We also elucidate the mechanisms of bouncing inhibition in the heavy and viscous drop limiting regimes by calculating the energy budgets and relating them to the drop's shape and internal flow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available