4.6 Review

Effectiveness of social prescribing for chronic disease prevention in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages 265-276

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2022-220247

Keywords

LIFE STYLE; META-ANALYSIS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; HEALTH PROMOTION

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social prescribing (SP) links patients with non-medical interventions in the community to address socioeconomic and behavioral determinants. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials found that SP exercise interventions were associated with a slight increase in physical activity, but no significant improvement in metabolic factors. Further rigorous studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of SP in modifying the determinants of chronic disease and promoting sustainable healthy behaviors.
BackgroundSocial prescribing (SP) enables healthcare professionals to link patients with non-medical interventions available in the community to address underlying socioeconomic and behavioural determinants. We synthesised the evidence to understand the effectiveness of SP for chronic disease prevention. MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted using five databases and two registries. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials of SP among community-dwelling adults recruited from primary care or community setting, investigating any chronic disease risk factors defined by the WHO (behavioural factors: smoking, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and excessive alcohol consumption; metabolic factors: raised blood pressure, overweight/obesity, hyperlipidaemia and hyperglycaemia). Random effect meta-analyses were performed at two time points: completion of intervention and follow-up after trial. ResultsWe identified nine reports from eight trials totalling 4621 participants. All studies evaluated SP exercise interventions which were highly heterogeneous regarding the content, duration, frequency and length of follow-up. Majority of studies had some concerns for risk of bias. Meta-analysis revealed that SP likely increased physical activity (completion: mean difference (MD) 21 min/week, 95% CI 3 to 39, I-2=0%; follow-up <= 12 months: MD 19 min/week, 95% CI 8 to 29, I-2=0%). However, SP may not improve markers of adiposity, blood pressure, glucose and serum lipid. There were no eligible studies that primarily target unhealthy diet, smoking and excessive alcohol drinking behaviours. ConclusionsSP exercise interventions probably increased physical activity slightly; however, no benefits were observed for metabolic factors. Determining whether SP is effective in modifying the determinants of chronic diseases and promotes sustainable healthy behaviours is limited by the current evidence of quantification and uncertainty, warranting further rigorous studies. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022346687.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available