4.4 Article

Perspectives on peak liquid manure temperature with implications for methane emissions

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 939-947

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20483

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methane emissions from liquid manure storage are currently estimated using a methane conversion factor (MCF) based on manure temperature inputs or air temperatures. However, differences between peak manure temperature and peak air temperature (T-diff) in warm seasons may result in inaccurate estimates. This study investigates the relationship between T-diff and the ratio of manure surface area to volume (R-s:v) and suggests using manure volume and surface area, along with removal frequency, to estimate T-diff and improve MCF estimates.
Methane emissions from liquid manure storage are currently estimated with a methane conversion factor (MCF) based on manure temperature inputs or air temperatures as a substitute in the 2019 IPCC Tier 2 method. However, differences between peak manure temperature and peak air temperature (T-diff) in warm seasons are likely to occur and result in poor estimates of MCF and methane emissions. To address this concern, this study aims to investigate the relationship between the T-diff and ratio of manure surface area to manure volume (R-s:v) using a mechanistic model and by analyzing farm-scale measurement studies across Canada. Positive correlations between T-diff and R-s:v were found using a modeling approach and from farm-scale results (r = 0.55, p = 0.06). T-diff ranged from -2.2 to 2.6 degrees C in farm-scale results mainly collected from eastern Canada. We suggest that manure volume and surface area, in addition to removal frequency, could be used to estimate T-diff and be part of the criteria for improving manure temperature estimates, which could lead to improved estimates of MCF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available