4.6 Article

Influence of different ultra-soft toothbrushes on erosive tooth wear

Journal

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104502

Keywords

Erosive tooth wear; Toothbrushing; Toothbrush bristles; Enamel; Dentin; Optical profilometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the influence of different ultra-soft toothbrushes on the progression of erosive tooth wear (ETW). The results showed that flexible handle toothbrushes had a greater effect on enamel erosion, while round-end bristles (ultra-soft and soft) had a greater impact on dentin erosion.
Objective: To investigate the influence of different ultra-soft toothbrushes on the progression of erosive tooth wear (ETW). Methods: Bovine enamel and dentin specimens (n = 10) were submitted to a 5-day erosive-abrasive cycling model (0.3% citric acid for 5 min, artificial saliva for 60 min, 4x/day). Toothbrushing was carried out 2x/day for 15 s, with the different toothbrushes tested (A- Edel White: flexible handle, tapered bristles; B- Oral-B Gengiva Detox: regular handle, criss-cross tapered bristles; C- Colgate Gengiva Therapy: flexible handle, tapered bristles, high tuft density; D- Oral-B Expert Gengiva Sensi: regular handle, round end bristles, high tuft density; E- Oral-B Indicator Plus: soft brush, round end bristles (control). Surface loss (SL, in mu m) was assessed by optical profilometry. The toothbrush characteristics were evaluated by a surgical microscope. Data were statistically analyzed (alpha=0.05). Results: For enamel, toothbrush C showed the highest SL (means +/- SD: 9.86 +/- 1.28) and it did not differ significantly from A (8.60 +/- 0.50), both with flexible handles. The lowest SL was observed for the toothbrush Control E (6.76 +/- 0.63), which differed significantly from A and C, but not from the other toothbrushes. For dentin, the highest SL was found for toothbrush D (6.97 +/- 1.05) and it did not differ significantly from E (6.23 +/- 0.71). The lowest SL was observed for B (4.61 +/- 0.71) and C (4.85 + 0.83), without significant differences from A (5.01 +/- 1.24). Conclusions: The ultra-soft toothbrushes had different impacts on the progression of ETW on the dental substrates. On enamel, higher ETW values were observed for the flexible handle toothbrushes, while for dentin, round-end bristles (ultra-soft and soft) caused more ETW. Clinical significance: Knowledge about the effect of different ultra-soft toothbrushes on ETW can help clinicians to recommend the most suitable types for their patients, bearing in mind that toothbrushes can impact enamel and dentin differently.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available