4.7 Article

Effects of abomasally infused rumen fluid from corn-challenged donor cows on production, metabolism, and inflammatory biomarkers in healthy recipient cows

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages 4336-4352

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22809

Keywords

leaky gut; rumen acidosis; fecal pH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subacute rumen acidosis may cause dysfunction of the intestinal barrier, which is not due to increased hindgut fermentation. It is possible that the plethora of harmful substances produced in the rumen during subacute rumen acidosis, such as ethanol, endotoxin, and amines, contribute to intestinal hyperpermeability. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of abomasal infusion of acidotic rumen fluid collected from donor cows on systemic inflammation, metabolism, and production in healthy recipient cows.
Subacute rumen acidosis may cause postruminal in-testinal barrier dysfunction, but this does not appear to be due to increased hindgut fermentation. Alterna-tively, intestinal hyperpermeability may be explained by the plethora of potentially harmful substances (e.g., ethanol, endotoxin, and amines) produced in the rumen during subacute rumen acidosis, which are difficult to isolate in traditional in vivo experiments. Therefore, ob-jectives were to evaluate whether abomasal infusion of acidotic rumen fluid collected from donor (Donor) cows elicits systemic inflammation or alters metabolism or production in healthy recipients. Ten rumen-cannulated lactating dairy cows [249 & PLUSMN; 63 d in milk; 753 & PLUSMN; 32 kg of body weight (BW)] were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 abomasal infusion treatments: (1) healthy rumen fluid (HF; 5 L/h; n = 5) or (2) acidotic rumen fluid (AF; 5 L/h; n = 5) infused. Eight rumen-cannulated cows [4 dry, 4 lactating (lactating = 391 & PLUSMN; 220 d in milk); 760 & PLUSMN; 70 kg of BW] were used as Donor cows. All 18 cows were acclimated to a high-fiber diet (46% neutral detergent fiber; 14% starch) during an 11-d prefeeding period during which rumen fluid was collected for the eventual infusion into HF cows. During period (P) 1 (5 d), baseline data were obtained and on d 5 Donor were corn-challenged (2.75% BW ground corn after 16 h of 75% feed restriction). Cows were fasted until 36 h rela-tive to rumen acidosis induction (RAI), and data were collected through 96 h RAI. At 12 h RAI, an additional 0.50% BW of ground corn was added, and acidotic fluid collections began (7 L/Donor every 2 h; 6 M HCl was added to collected fluid until pH was between 5.0 and 5.2). On d 1 of P2 (4 d), HF/AF cows were abomasally infused with their respective treatments for 16 h, and data were collected for 96 h relative to the first infu-sion. Data were analyzed in SAS (SAS Institute Inc.) using PROC MIXED. Following the corn challenge in the Donor cows, rumen pH only mildly decreased at nadir (pH = 5.64 at 8 h RAI) and remained above the desired threshold for both acute (5.2) and subacute (5.6) acidosis. In contrast, fecal and blood pH markedly decreased to acidotic levels (nadir = 4.65 and 7.28 at 36 and 30 h RAI, respectively), and fecal pH remained be-low 5 from 22 to 36 h RAI. In Donor cows, dry matter intake remained decreased through d 4 (36% relative to baseline) and serum amyloid A and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein markedly increased by 48 h RAI in Donor cows (30-and 3-fold, respectively). In cows that received the abomasal infusions, fecal pH decreased in AF from 6 to 12 h relative to the first infusion (7.07 vs. 6.33) compared with HF; however, milk yield, dry matter intake, energy-corrected milk, rectal tempera-ture, serum amyloid A, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein were unaffected. Overall, the corn challenge did not cause subacute rumen acidosis but markedly decreased fecal and blood pH and stimulated a delayed inflammatory response in the Donor cows. Abomasal infusion of rumen fluid from corn-challenged Donor cows decreased fecal pH but did not cause inflamma-tion, nor did it create an immune-activated phenotype in recipient cows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available