Non-perturbative analysis for a massless minimal quantum scalar with V(?) = A?4/4!+0?3/3! in the inflationary de Sitter spacetime

We consider a massless, minimally coupled quantum scalar field theory with an asymmetric self interaction, V (0) = A04/4! + 003/3! (A > 0) in the inflationary de Sitter spacetime. The potential is bounded from below. While the 0 = 0 case has been much well studied, the motivation behind taking such a hybrid potential corresponds to the fact that it might generate finite negative vacuum expectation values of V (0) as well of 0, leading to some dynamical screening of the inflationary cosmological constant A, at late times, with the initial conditions, (0) = 0 = (V (0)). In this work we first compute the vacuum expec-tation values of 0, 02 and V (0), using the late time, non-perturbative and infrared effective stochastic formalism. The backreactions to the inflationary A are estimated. We also com-pute the dynamically generated mass of the scalar field using (02). We next compute (02) using quantum field theory with respect to the initial Bunch-Davies vacuum at one and two loops, using the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. These results show non-perturbative secular logarithms, growing with the cosmological time. Using next a recently proposed renormalisa-tion group inspired formalism, we attempt to find out a resummed (02). We have been able to resum some part of the same which contains contributions only from the local self energy. The corresponding dynamically generated mass is computed. Comparison of the stochastic and the quantum field theory results shows that they differ numerically, although they have similar qualitative behaviour. Possible reasons for such quantitative mismatch is discussed. The manifestation of strong non-classical effects in the results found via both the formalisms has been emphasised.

Automated summary

This paper investigates a massless, minimally coupled quantum scalar field theory with an asymmetric self interaction in the inflationary de Sitter spacetime. The results obtained using quantum mechanical methods and stochastic methods show similar qualitative behavior but differ numerically, and the reasons for this quantitative mismatch are discussed.