4.4 Article

A general expression for the statistical error in a diffusion coefficient obtained from a solid-state molecular-dynamics simulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 44, Issue 14, Pages 1347-1359

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.27090

Keywords

diffusion; kinetic Monte Carlo; kMC; mean squared displacement; MSD; molecular dynamics; MD; statistical error

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of the mean squared displacement of species k as a function of simulation time allows the extraction of tracer diffusion coefficient from a molecular dynamics simulation. The statistical error in the diffusion coefficient is often underestimated. In this study, we examined the statistics of displacement curves generated by solid-state diffusion and derived a closed-form expression for the relative uncertainty in the diffusion coefficient.
Analysis of the mean squared displacement of species k, (r(2) (k)), as a function of simulation time t constitutes a powerful method for extracting, from a molecular-dynamics (MD) simulation, the tracer diffusion coefficient, D-* k. The statistical error in D* (k) is seldom considered, and when it is done, the error is generally underestimated. In this study, we examined the statistics of (r(2) (k))(t) curves generated by solid-state diffusion by means of kinetic Monte Carlo sampling. Our results indicate that the statistical error in D-* k depends, in a strongly interrelated way, on the simulation time, the cell size, and the number of relevant point defects in the simulation cell. Reducing our results to one key quantity-the number of k particles that have jumped at least once-we derive a closed-form expression for the relative uncertainty in D-* k. We confirm the accuracy of our expression through comparisons with self-generated MD diffusion data. With the expression, we formulate a set of simple rules that encourage the efficient use of computational resources for MD simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available