4.7 Article

Bortezomib-Dexamethasone, Rituximab, and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Treatment for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia: A Prospectively Randomized Trial of the European Consortium for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 14, Pages 2607-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01805

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) as first-line treatment in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). The results showed that both DRC and bortezomib-DRC (B-DRC) were highly effective and well tolerated in treating WM. Therefore, fixed duration immunochemotherapy remains an important pillar in the clinical management of WM.
PURPOSERituximab/chemotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). In addition, bortezomib has shown significant activity in WM. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) as first-line treatment in WM.METHODSIn this European study, treatment-naive patients were randomly assigned to DRC or bortezomib-DRC B-DRC for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included response rates, overall survival, and safety.RESULTSTwo hundred four patients were registered. After a median follow-up of 27.5 months, the estimated 24-month progression-free survival was 80.6% (95% CI, 69.5 to 88.0) for B-DRC and 72.8% (95% CI, 61.3 to 81.3) for DRC (P = .32). At the end of treatment, B-DRC and DRC induced major responses in 80.6% versus 69.9% and a complete response/very good partial response in 17.2% versus 9.6% of patients, respectively. The median time to first response was shorter for B-DRC with 3.0 (95% CI, 2.8 to 3.2) versus 5.5 (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.8) months for DRC. This resulted in higher major response rates (57.0% v 32.5%; P < .01) after three cycles of B-DRC compared with DRC. At best response, the complete response/very good partial response increased to 32.6% for B-DRC. Both treatments were well tolerated: grade >= 3 adverse events occurred in 49.2% of all patients (B-DRC, 49.5%; DRC, 49.0%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy grade 3 occurred in two patients treated with B-DRC and in none with DRC.CONCLUSIONThis large randomized study illustrates that B-DRC is highly effective and well tolerated in WM. The data demonstrate that fixed duration immunochemotherapy remains an important pillar in the clinical management of WM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available