4.7 Article

Phenol adsorption equilibrium and kinetics on zeolite X/activated carbon composite

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.02.004

Keywords

Adsorption; Kinetics; Isotherms; Phenol removal; Zeolite X/activated carbon

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51204120]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M510782]
  3. NaturalScience Foundation of Shanxi [2014021014-1]
  4. Key Scientific and Technological Project of coal fund of Shanxi province [FT201402-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The zeolite X/activated carbon composite (X/AC) was prepared from elutrilithe by adding pitch powder and solid SiO2 was used to adsorb phenol from aqueous solutions. To investigate the influences of solution pH, contact time and temperature on the phenol adsorption capacities of the composite material, batch experiments were conducted under different conditions. The adsorption performances of 13X, the activated sample (AC) and X/AC were also compared. The results showed X/AC exhibited better adsorption performance for the removal of phenol than 13X and AC. Furthermore, the adsorption ability of X/AC was revealed by equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic parameters. The adsorption kinetic data could be better represented by pseudo-second-order equation and the intra-particle diffusion model. It is shown that the adsorption rate was controlled by both the pore diffusion and the external layer diffusion. The equilibrium adsorption data were better described by Redlich-Peterson and Freundlich equations, indicating that X/AC possessed various functional groups. The obtained thermodynamic parameters demonstrate that adsorption of phenol was spontaneous, favorable, endothermic, and realized by the electron donor acceptor complex and the solvent effects. (C) 2016 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available