4.6 Review

A scoping review described diversity in methods of randomization and reporting of baseline balance in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 134-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.010

Keywords

Baseline balance; Covariate adjustment; Stratification; Reporting guidelines; Random allocation; Covariate constrained randomization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the methods of randomization and reporting of balance at baseline in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs). The findings suggest that most trials use unrestricted allocation for cluster randomization and there are limitations in reporting balance at baseline. The authors recommend that researchers need more guidance on methods of randomization and assessment of baseline balance.
Objectives: In stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs), clusters are randomized not to treatment and control arms but to sequences dictating the times of crossing from control to intervention conditions. Randomization is an essential feature of this design but application of standard methods to promote and report on balance at baseline is not straightforward. We aimed to describe current methods of randomization and reporting of balance at baseline in SW-CRTs.Study Design and Setting: We used electronic searches to identify primary reports of SW-CRTs published between 2016 and 2022. Results: Across 160 identified trials, the median number of clusters randomized was 11 (Q1-Q3: 8-18). Sixty-three (39%) used restricted randomizationdmost often stratification based on a single cluster-level covariate; 12 (19%) of these adjusted for the covariate(s) in the primary analysis. Overall, 50 (31%) and 134 (84%) reported on balance at baseline on cluster- and individual-level characteristics, respectively. Balance on individual-level characteristics was most often reported by condition in cross-sectional designs and by sequence in cohort designs. Authors reported baseline imbalances in 72 (45%) trials.Conclusion: SW-CRTs often randomize a small number of clusters using unrestricted allocation. Investigators need guidance on appropriate methods of randomization and assessment and reporting of balance at baseline. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available