4.6 Article

Trial lay summaries were not fit for purpose

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 105-112

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.02.023

Keywords

Trials; Communication; Lay summaries; Readability; Plain English; Patient and public involvement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By evaluating the readability of lay summaries from 60 randomly selected randomized controlled trial reports, it was found that none of the summaries met the recommended reading age for health information (11-12 years), and over 85% of the summaries were considered difficult to read.
Background and Objectives: To establish if trial lay summaries are suitable for lay readers.Methods: A random sample of 60 randomized controlled trial (RCT) reports (15%) from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Journals Library, UK, were selected from 407 available ones. We extracted the lay summary and determined the read-ability using the previously validated Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simplified Measure of Gobbledegook (SMOG), Gunning Fog (GF), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), and Automated Readability Index (ARI) readability scales. This provided us with a reading age. We also assessed the compatibility of the lay summaries with the Plain English UK Guidelines and the National Adult Literacy Agency Guidelines, Ireland.Results: No lay summary met the recommended reading age for health care information of 11-12 years. None of them were considered easyto read, in fact over 85% were considered difficultto read.Conclusion: The lay summary is a key document for disseminating trial results to a broad population who may not necessarily have the medical or technical jargon to read a trial report. Its importance cannot be overstated. Assessing readability in conjunction with plain lan-guage guidelines is relatively easy and therefore an immediate change to practice is feasible. However, since specific skills are required to write lay summaries that meet the required standards, it is important that the need for such expertise is recognized and supported by research funders. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available