4.7 Article

Influence of techniques on synthesizing cashew nut shell oil as a prospective biolubricant on its physicochemical, tribological, and thermal behaviors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 401, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136717

Keywords

Cashew nut shell oil; Tribology; Physicochemical; Thermal; Synthesizing methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rising demand for lubricants and unstable government policies have led to the need for a renewable base stock for petroleum-based lubricants. Non-edible vegetable oils, due to their abundance worldwide and biodegradability, provide an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional lubricants. This study focuses on the feasibility of using Cashew nut shell oil (CNSO) as a lubricant base stock, specifically comparing mechanically expelled oil from boiled cashew shells (MEO) and oil extracted from raw cut shells (SEO). The evaluation of lubricating properties shows that MEO is more abundant and exhibits a lower wear scar diameter, better thermal properties, viscosity index, and oxidative stability compared to SEO, making it a preferable option as a lubricant.
Rising demand for lubricants and temperamental government policies hastened the need for a renewable base stock for petroleum-based lubricants. The environment-friendly alternative for conventional lubricants can be developed from non-edible vegetable oils due to its abundance all over the world and biodegradability. The present study focuses on the feasibility study of utilizing Cashew nut shell oil (CNSO) as a lubricant base stock, which is one of the cheap and abundant non-edible oil. Two different types of CNSO are being synthesizedmechanically expelled oil from the boiled cashew shell (MEO) and the oil extracted from raw cut shells (SEO). Lubricating properties such as physicochemical, tribological, thermal, corrosive, and oxidative properties are being evaluated for MEO and SEO samples. It was observed that MEO being more abundant compared with SEO, possesses a low wear scar diameter of 714 mu m, better thermal properties, viscosity index, and oxidative stability. Hence MEO is a better option to be considered as a lubricant comparing SEO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available