4.6 Article

POLICIES OF IMPROVING DEVELOPERS? WILLINGNESS TO IMPLEMENT PREFABRICATED BUILDING: A CASE STUDY FROM CHINA

Journal

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 289-302

Publisher

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2023.18469

Keywords

policy; prefabricated building; developers; text analysis; value analysis; policy framework

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to identify effective policies and develop a practical policy framework to promote the development of prefabricated building (PB). Through text analysis and survey, it found that the current policy system of PBs is complete but uneven, with a focus on environmental policies. The most cost-effective tools are land limitations, tax incentives, and financial support. This study provides a reference for policy evaluation and formulation, expanding the literature research on PB policies.
Multiple policies have been formulated to promote the development of prefabricated building (PB). However, ineffective policies increase the financial burden of the governments and hinder PB development. This study aims to iden-tify effective policies and develop a practical policy framework to encourage developers to implement PB. Text analysis is to identify the policies related to PBs from the numerous samples. A survey is to verify the effective policies and explore their effects on the developers' willingness to implement PBs. The findings suggest that the current policy system of PBs is complete but uneven, focusing on environmental policies. The most cost-effective tools are land limitations, tax incentives, and financial support. Besides, policies are interrelated in affecting developers' willingness to implement PBs. It provides a reference for policy evaluation in application scenarios, which expands the literature research on the policy. Meanwhile, it provides a guide for policymakers to evaluate the effectiveness of policies and formulate practical policy frameworks to promote PB development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available