Journal
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages 1917-1925Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00044
Keywords
Upper-Division Undergraduate; Graduate Education; Research; Cheminformatics; Communication; Writing; Organometallics
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The ability to communicate scientific concepts is crucial for chemistry and STEM students. While current chemistry curricula focus on technical information for expert audiences, this article presents an assignment that aims to improve students' ability to communicate this information to general audiences using infographics. The assignment incorporates a unique feedback model involving instructor, peer, and near-peer groups for skill refinement.
The ability to communicate scientific concepts to expert and nonexpert audiences is an essential skill for chemistry and STEM students. Current chemistry curricula mainly focus on developing skills to communicate technical information to expert audiences, while relaying the same information to general audiences receives much less attention. Although numerous initiatives work to close this gap, many have logistical or financial barriers that make them difficult to integrate in a large classroom setting. Herein, we present an assignment focused on improving advanced students' (i.e., graduate and advanced undergraduate students) ability to communicate current organometallic chemistry research (i.e., technical information) to a general audience using infographics. Our assignment features a unique, iterative feedback model incorporating instructor, peer, and near-peer (general audience) groups to provide students with multiple opportunities to refine their communication skills. Anonymous student self-assessments of advanced undergraduate/ graduate students (infographic creators and peer reviewers) and first year, non-major undergraduate students (near-peer reviewers and general audience) indicate that the assignment led to (i) increased confidence in communication skills (advanced undergraduate/graduate students), (ii) a broadened understanding of advanced chemistry in everyday life (both), and (iii) increased recognition for the importance of scientific communication to different audiences (both). Reflections on student outcomes as well as recommendations and considerations for instructors are discussed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available