4.5 Article

Upregulation of MAPKAPK5-AS1, PXN-AS1 and URB1-AS1 lncRNAs in non-functioning pituitary adenoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 1550-1556

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.17763

Keywords

lncRNA; MAPKAPK5-AS1; non-functioning pituitary adenoma; PXN-AS1; URB1-AS1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the expression levels of six lncRNAs were evaluated in Iranian patients with NFPA. MAPKAPK5-AS1, PXN-AS1, and URB1-AS1 were found to be overexpressed in NFPA tissues. Furthermore, the relative expression levels of PXN-AS1 were associated with tumor subtype, while MAPKAPK5-AS1 and LIFR-AS1 were associated with patient gender. These findings suggest a potential role of MAPKAPK5-AS1, PXN-AS1, and URB1-AS1 in the pathogenesis of NFPAs.
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to be dysregulated in a variety of malignant and non-malignant lesions including non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). In the current experimental study, we have selected six lncRNAs, namely MAPKAPK5-AS1, NUTM2B-AS1, ST7-AS1, LIFR-AS1, PXN-AS1 and URB1-AS1 to assess their expression in a cohort of Iranian patients with NFPA. MAPKAPK5-AS1, PXN-AS1 and URB1-AS1 were shown to be over-expressed in NFPA tissues compared with control samples (Expression ratios (95% CI) = 10 (3.94-25.36), 11.22 (4.3-28.8) and 9.33 (4.12-21.12); p values < 0.0001, respectively). The depicted ROC curves showed the AUC values of 0.73, 0.80 and 0.73 for MAPKAPK5-AS1, PXN-AS1 and URB1-AS1, respectively. Relative expression level of PXN-AS1 was associated with tumour subtype (p value = 0.49). Besides, relative expression levels of MAPKAPK5-AS1 and LIFR-AS1 were associated with gender of patients (p values = 0.043 and 0.01, respectively). Cumulatively, the current study indicates the possible role of MAPKAPK5-AS1, PXN-AS1 and URB1-AS1 lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of NFPAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available