The biomechanical consequence of posterior interventions at the thoracolumbar spine on the passively stabilized flexed posture

In the flexed end-of-range position (e.g., during slumped sitting), the trunk is passively stabilized. Little is known about the biomechanical consequence of posterior approaches on passive stabilization. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of posterior surgical interventions on local and distant spinal regions. While being fixed at the pelvis, five human torsos were passively flexed. The change in spinal angulation at Th4, Th12, L4 and S1 was measured after level-wise longitudinal incisions of the thoracolumbar fascia, the paraspinal muscles, horizontal incisions of the inter-& supraspinous ligaments (ISL/SSL) and horizontal incision of the thoracolumbar fascia and the paraspinal muscles. Lumbar angulation (Th12-S1) was increased by 0.3 degrees for fascia, 0.5 degrees for muscle and 0.8 degrees for ISL/SSL-incisions per lumbar level. The effect of level-wise incisions at the lumbar spine was 1.4, 3.5 and 2.6 times greater compared to thoracic interventions for fascia, muscle and ISL/SSL respectively. The combined midline interventions at the lumbar spine were associated with 2.2 degrees extension of the thoracic spine. Horizontal incision of the fascia increased spinal angulation by 0.3 degrees, while horizontal muscle incision resulted in a collapse of 4/5 specimens. The thoracolumbar fascia, the paraspinal muscle and the ISL/SSL are important passive sta-bilizers for the trunk in the flexed end-of-range position. Lumbar interventions needed for approaches to the spine have a larger effect on spinal posture than thoracic interventions and the increase of spinal angulation at the level of the intervention is partially compensated at the neighboring spinal regions.

Automated summary

In the flexed end-of-range position, the trunk is passively stabilized. This study investigates the effect of posterior surgical interventions on local and distant spinal regions.