4.6 Article

EigenPrism: inference for high dimensional signal-to-noise ratios

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12203

Keywords

EigenPrism; Heritability; Regression error; Signal-to-noise ratio; Variance estimation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32GM096982]
  2. Simons Foundation
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  4. Broad Institute
  5. University of California at Los Angeles
  6. University of Oulu
  7. National Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consider the following three important problems in statistical inference: constructing confidence intervals for the error of a high dimensional (p>n) regression estimator, the linear regression noise level and the genetic signal-to-noise ratio of a continuous-valued trait ( related to the heritability). All three problems turn out to be closely related to the little-studied problem of performing inference on the (l)2-norm of the signal in high dimensional linear regression. We derive a novel procedure for this, which is asymptotically correct when the covariates are multivariate Gaussian and produces valid confidence intervals in finite samples as well. The procedure, called EigenPrism, is computationally fast and makes no assumptions on coefficient sparsity or knowledge of the noise level. We investigate the width of the EigenPrism confidence intervals, including a comparison with a Bayesian setting in which our interval is just 5% wider than the Bayes credible interval. We are then able to unify the three aforementioned problems by showing that EigenPrism with only minor modifications can make important contributions to all three. We also investigate the robustness of coverage and find that the method applies in practice and in finite samples much more widely than just the case of multivariate Gaussian covariates. Finally, we apply EigenPrism to a genetic data set to estimate the genetic signal-to-noise ratio for a number of continuous phenotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available