4.6 Article

A general framework for updating belief distributions

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12158

Keywords

Decision theory; General Bayesian updating; Generalized estimating equations; Gibbs posteriors; Information; Loss function; Maximum entropy; Provably approximately correct Bayes methods; Self-information loss function

Funding

  1. Oxford-Man Institute, Oxford
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K014463/1]
  3. Medical Research Council, UK [MC_UP_A390_1107]
  4. National Science Foundation [DMS 1506879]
  5. EPSRC [EP/K014463/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K014463/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a framework for general Bayesian inference. We argue that a valid update of a prior belief distribution to a posterior can be made for parameters which are connected to observations through a loss function rather than the traditional likelihood function, which is recovered as a special case. Modern application areas make it increasingly challenging for Bayesians to attempt to model the true data-generating mechanism. For instance, when the object of interest is low dimensional, such as a mean or median, it is cumbersome to have to achieve this via a complete model for the whole data distribution. More importantly, there are settings where the parameter of interest does not directly index a family of density functions and thus the Bayesian approach to learning about such parameters is currently regarded as problematic. Our framework uses loss functions to connect information in the data to functionals of interest. The updating of beliefs then follows from a decision theoretic approach involving cumulative loss functions. Importantly, the procedure coincides with Bayesian updating when a true likelihood is known yet provides coherent subjective inference in much more general settings. Connections to other inference frameworks are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available