4.5 Article

Including genotypic information in genetic evaluations increases the accuracy of sheep breeding values

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS
Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages 462-471

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12771

Keywords

accuracy change; animal welfare; breeding values; genetic parameters; genomic selection; meat sheep; sheep breeding; single-step

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the impact of including genome-wide genotypes into breeding value predictions for UK Texel sheep. The study examines the change in accuracy values for conventional breeding values (EBVs) when animal genotypes are incorporated into genetic evaluations. The results show that using genotypes in breeding value estimation can increase accuracy, especially for un-phenotyped animals with good links to the reference population.
The impact of inclusion of genome-wide genotypes into breeding value predictions for UK Texel sheep is addressed in this article. The main aim was to investigate the level of change in the accuracy values for EBVs when information from animal genotypes is incorporated into the genetic evaluations. New genetic parameters for a range of lamb growth, carcass composition and health traits are described and applied in the estimation of conventional breeding values (EBVs) for almost 822,000 animals as well as genomic breeding values (gEBVs) after adding 10,143 genotypes. Principal component analyses showed that there are no major distinct groups; hence, the population is mainly homogenous and genetically well-linked. Results suggested that the highest change in accuracy was observed for the animals that are not phenotyped but have good links to the reference population. This was seen especially for the lowly heritable health traits thereby proving that the use of genotypes in breeding values estimation may accelerate the genetic gain by producing more accurate values especially for young, un-phenotyped animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available