4.5 Review

Technology-Based Counselling for People with Dementia and Their Informal Carers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages 891-906

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-221194

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; counselling; dementia; information technology; remotely delivered intervention

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of technology-based counselling interventions for people with dementia and informal carers. Five randomized controlled trials were included, and the results showed that these interventions had no significant effects on depressive symptoms, burden, and self-efficacy/mastery. However, the reliability of the findings is low due to potential bias in the methods used.
Background: Information technology can enhance timely and individual support for people with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias and their informal carers. Objective: To review the effectiveness of technology-based counselling interventions for people with dementia and informal carers. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of remote dementia counselling interventions were included. We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and theWeb of Science Core Collection (April 2021) in combination with citation tracking and free web searching (October to November 2021). We provide meta-analyses for caregiver depression, burden, and self-efficacy/mastery and structured reporting for other outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and the Risk of Bias 2 tool were applied. Results: We included five randomized controlled trials involving 880 participants. Interventions were provided for carers (four studies) or dyads (one study). Carers were predominantly women and were the spouses or children of people with dementia. Counselling was delivered via telephone or videoconference with two to 23 sessions over 1 to 12 months. Control groups received educational and resource materials only, standard (helpline) services, non-directive support, or home visits. Meta-analysis for our primary outcome, depressive symptoms in carers, revealed no statistically significant effect (SMD -0.15; 95% CI -0.40 to 0.10). There were also no significant effects on burden and self-efficacy/mastery. We rated the certainty of evidence as low to very low and all outcomes at an overall high risk of bias. Conclusion: The effectiveness of technology-based counselling interventions for people with dementia and informal carers remains uncertain. Theory-based approaches are needed for the development and evaluation of these interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available