4.7 Article

Versatile synthesis of 1-D akaganeite nanoparticles with fine-tuned exchange biasing and weak ferromagnetic effect

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 962, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171056

Keywords

Iron oxide; Nanorods; Excahnge biasing; Weak ferromagnetism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reported the synthesis of akaganeite nano-sticks by two different reaction pathways, which can achieve good control on microstructure and surface properties, providing new application opportunities.
Low dimension materials (especially antiferromagnetic nanoparticles) exhibit extraordinary magnetic properties, which are different from their bulk counterparts. Herein we report the synthesis of akaganeite nano-sticks by two different reaction pathways that enable good control on microstructure and surface properties, ensuring new application opportunities. Akaganeite nano-sticks prepared via conventional method have a length of 1.8 & PLUSMN; 0.15 & mu;m and a diameter of 100 & PLUSMN; 20 nm with a smooth surface. Whereas modified method results in the synthesis of akaganeite nano-sticks with nanorods grown on their surface. Akaganeite nano-sticks produced by modified method have a length and diameter of 2.06 & PLUSMN; 0.02 & mu;m and 160.26 & PLUSMN; 8.08 nm respectively. Ferromagnetism and near room temperature exchange biasing (250 K) was found in both the samples. The conventional method (AKN-0) demonstrates exchange biasing of 5700 A/m at 50 K whereas the modified method (AKN-2.5) shows 66275 A/m (approximately 11 times increased). XPS reveals defects generation in both methods, which results in the existence and enhancement of such magnetic properties. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available