4.7 Article

Polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of anorexia nervosa: A Mendelian randomization study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 330, Issue -, Pages 245-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.016

Keywords

Polyunsaturated fatty acids; Eating disorder; Anorexia nervosa; Mendelian randomization; European ancestry; Epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used Mendelian randomization analysis to examine the hypothesis that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) decrease the risk of anorexia nervosa (AN), and found no significant association.
Purpose: Observational studies have suggested that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) decrease the risk of anorexia nervosa (AN). In the present study, we examined this hypothesis using a Mendelian randomization analysis.Methods: We used summary statistics for single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with plasma levels of n-6 (linoleic acid and arachidonic acid) and n-3 PUFAs (alpha-linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosa-pentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid) and the corresponding data for AN from a genome-wide association meta-analysis of 72,517 individuals (16,992 diagnosed AN cases and 55,525 controls).Results: None of the genetically predicted PUFAs were significantly associated with the risk of AN; odds ratios (95 % confidence interval) per 1 standard deviation increase in PUFA levels were 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) for linoleic acid, 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) for arachidonic acid, 1.03 (0.94, 1.12) for alpha-linolenic acid, 0.98 (0.90, 1.08) for eicosapentaenoic acid, 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) for docosapentaenoic acid, and 1.01 (0.90, 1.36) for docosahexaenoic acid.Limitation: Only two types of fatty acids (LA and DPA) can be used for pleiotropy tests using the MR-Egger intercept test.Conclusion: This study does not support the hypothesis that PUFAs decrease the risk of AN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available