4.6 Article

An Urgent Need for School-Based Diversion Programs for Adolescent Substance Use: A Statewide Survey of School Personnel

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages 428-436

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.04.006

Keywords

Diversion programs; Alternative -to -suspension; School; Substance use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the perceptions of school personnel on diversion programs for addressing substance use in schools. The findings revealed that despite the belief in punishment as an appropriate response, diversion programs were considered more effective but less commonly used. Barriers to implementing diversion programs included funding, staff training, and parental support.
Purpose: There has been growing interest in reserving punishment as a last resort to address substance use in schools. However, there is significant variability in adoption of alternative approaches. This study reported school personnel's perceptions of diversion programs, identified characteristics of schools/districts that currently have diversion programs, and defined barriers of implementation of diversion programs.Methods: One hundred fifty six school stakeholders from Massachusetts' K-12 schools, including district administrators, principals and vice principals, school resource officers, guidance coun-selors, and nurses, completed a web-based survey in MayeJune 2020. Participants were recruited through e-mail distributed via professional listservs, direct school outreach, and community co-alitions. The web survey queried beliefs, attitudes, and actions that schools take regarding sub-stance use infractions as well as perceived barriers to implementing diversion programs.Results: Participants endorsed strong beliefs that punishment was an appropriate school response for student substance use, particularly for nontobacco-related infractions. Despite these personal beliefs, diversion programs were rated as more effective but less commonly used than punitive approaches (37% of respondents reported having diversion programs in their schools/districts vs. 85% used punitive approaches) (p < .03). Punishment was more likely to be used to respond to cannabis, alcohol, and other substances compared to tobacco (p < .02). Primary barriers of implementing diversion programs included funding, staff training, and parental support.Discussion: Based on school personnel perceptions, these findings lend further support for a transition away from punishment and toward more restorative alternatives. However, barriers to sustainability and equity were identified that warrant consideration when implementing diversion programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available