4.2 Article

Efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab up to every 16 weeks in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year results from the Japan subgroup of the phase 3 TENAYA trial

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages 301-310

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-023-00985-w

Keywords

Angiopoietin-2; Anti-VEGF therapy; Choroidal neovascularization; Faricimab; Neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article evaluated the 1-year efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab compared to aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the Japan subgroup of the TENAYA trial. The study showed that both faricimab and aflibercept had similar improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with adjusted mean BCVA changes of +7.1 and +7.7 letters, respectively. The use of faricimab every 16 weeks in the Japanese patients demonstrated sustained efficacy and an acceptable safety profile.
PurposeTo evaluate the 1-year efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) enrolled in the Japan subgroup of the TENAYA trial.Study designTENAYA (NCT03823287) was a global, phase 3, multicenter, randomized, active comparator-controlled, double-masked, noninferiority, parallel-group, 112-week trial. After completion of global enrollment, additional patients were enrolled in the Japan extension of TENAYA.MethodsTreatment-naive patients aged >= 50 years with nAMD were randomized (1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6 mg up to every 16 weeks (Q16W) after 4 initial Q4W doses based on disease activity at weeks 20 and 24 or aflibercept 2 mg Q8W after 3 initial Q4W doses. Primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48. Anatomical/durability outcomes were assessed.ResultsOverall, 133 patients were included in the TENAYA Japan subgroup analysis (faricimab, n = 66; aflibercept, n = 67). The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) BCVA changes were + 7.1 (4.6-9.7) and + 7.7 (5.2-10.1) letters in the faricimab and aflibercept treatment groups, respectively. At week 48, 66.1%, 22.6%, and 11.3% of patients in the faricimab group were on Q16W, Q12W, Q8W and dosing intervals, respectively. Ocular adverse event rates were similar between treatment groups (faricimab, n = 14 [21.2%] versus aflibercept, n = 17 [25.4%]).ConclusionThe TENAYA Japan subgroup analysis showed that faricimab up to Q16W had sustained efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. These findings are consistent with the global TENAYA and LUCERNE findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available