4.4 Article

Development of a water-energy-food nexus model for multiscale studies

Journal

IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2800

Keywords

basin scale; block scale; energy subindex; food subindex; Pardee-RAND WEF Nexus Index; water subindex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A spatially distributed water-energy-food (WEF) nexus model has been developed to analyze the WEF security of an area using the Pardee-RAND WEF approach. The model calculates water energy, food subindices, and the WEF nexus index to understand the WEF nexus and identify areas requiring specific policy interventions at different administrative levels.
A spatially distributed water-energy-food (WEF) nexus model has been developed using the Pardee-RAND WEF approach to analyse the WEF security of an area. The Pardee-RAND equations have been modified to include the earlier neglected WEF indicators to tackle the WEF challenges holistically. The model is coded in Python and has an operating system-independent graphical user interface (GUI). The model helps understand the WEF nexus by calculating water energy, food subindices and the WEF nexus index. We tested the model in the Kangsabati River Basin (distributed at the block level) and across India (states/union territory level). The result shows that the WEF nexus indices vary significantly over the country's small (block) to large (state) administrative units. The water energy and food subindices and WEF nexus index for the Kangsabati River Basin are 0.89, 0.73, 0.79 and 0.80, respectively, while for India, the corresponding values are 0.67, 0.53, 0.73 and 0.63, respectively. The blocks or states/union territories needing specific policy interventions are identified. The study will help influence policy and resource planning at different administrative levels to ensure better management of WEF resources holistically and equitably.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available