4.7 Article

Effect of the lid-driven on mixed convection in an open flexible wall cavity with a partially heated bottom wall

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108213

Keywords

Flexible surface; Fluid -structure interaction FSI; Open lid -driven cavity; Mixed convection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work investigates the FSI-mixed convection heat transfer in a lid-driven vented cavity. The effects of key factors such as the Richardson number and the Reynolds numbers ratio are studied. Results show that the use of a flexible wall and a specific movement of the top wall is feasible and can significantly enhance heat transfer.
The FSI-mixed convection heat transfer in a lid-driven vented cavity is studied in the present work. The heat source is set partially on the base of the cavity; the left flexible wall is cold, while the remaining walls are adiabatic. The top wall of the cavity moves in different cases depending on its movement; stationary wall (case 0), moving to the left (case I) and moving to the right (case II). The arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation and finite element method are utilized to solve the governing equations. A two-dimensional incompressible laminar flow with an unsteady-state condition is used in the present model. The effects of relevant factors like the Richardson number 0.01 <= Ri <= 100 and the ratio of the velocities of moving top wall to that of the air entering the cavity, which is governed by Reynolds numbers ratio 1 <= Rer <= 4 have been studied. The outcomes demonstrate the feasibility of using a flexible wall and a special movement of the top wall. The percentage in-crease of the Nusselt number due to the flexible wall alone is about 4.5% while when the top wall moving to the left (case I), the augmentation rises to 28%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available