4.7 Article

Dose-Volume Predictors for Radiation Esophagitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Hypofractionated Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.060

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence and dose-volume predictors of radiation esophagitis (RE) in breast cancer patients undergoing hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation. The study found that the incidence of grade 2 and 3 RE was 40.9% and 0.3% respectively, with no grade 4 or 5 RE occurring within 6 months after radiation therapy.
Purpose: Our objective was to assess the incidence and dose-volume predictors of radiation esophagitis (RE) in patients with breast cancer undergoing hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation.Methods and Materials: Eligible patients who received intensity modulated radiation therapy (RT) at the chest wall, the supraclavicular/infraclavicular fossa, level II axilla, and/or the internal mammary chain after mastectomy were included. The prescribed dose was 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions. RE was evaluated weekly during RT and at 1 and 2 weeks, followed by 3 and 6 months after RT, and was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. The esophagus was contoured from the lower border level of the cricoid cartilage to the lower margin of the aortic arch. Esophageal total volume, mean dose, maximum dose, and the relative volumes (RV) and absolute volumes (AV) receiving at least 5 to 45 Gy by 5-Gy increments (RV5-RV45 and AV5-AV45) were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for RE, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtainedResults: In total, 298 patients were included between May 8, 2020, and January 5, 2022 (minimum post-RT follow-up: 6 months). Grade 2 and 3 RE incidence was 40.9% (122/298) and 0.3% (1/298), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 RE was

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available