4.7 Article

Inventory replenishment decisions with uncertain price and demand

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2223701

Keywords

Inventory management; price uncertainty; procurement algorithm; competitive analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the problem of inventory replenishment in a capacitated warehouse with uncertain procurement prices and market demands. The goal is to minimize the costs of procuring and holding inventory. A competitive analysis framework is used, and an efficient online real-time replenishment algorithm is developed. The algorithm does not rely on any distribution assumption and makes decisions based on past and present information. The paper also presents a theoretical performance guarantee and shows that the algorithm performs well in situations with high volatility uncertainty over time and exhibits risk-averse behavior. Numerical experiments further validate the effectiveness of the algorithm.
This paper studies the multiple period inventory replenishment problem for a capacitated warehouse when procurement prices and market demands are both uncertain, with the goal to minimise the procuring and holding costs. We analyse this problem under the framework of competitive analysis, where neither probabilistic distributions nor sets are available to characterise the unknown price and demand parameters. An efficient online real-time replenishment algorithm is developed, which is free of any distribution assumption, and the decisions are made based entirely on past and present information. We derive an instance-independent competitive ratio of the algorithm, which provides a worst-case theoretical performance guarantee, and shows that the proposed algorithm performs well for situations with high volatility uncertainty over time and is naturally risk-averse. Finally, a set of numerical experiments further verifies the effectiveness of the algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available