4.5 Article

Comparison of bubbles interaction mechanisms of two-group Interfacial Area Transport Equation model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2023.104399

Keywords

Two-group interfacial area transport equation; (IATE); Two-fluid model; CFD; Churn regime; Cap-turbulent regime; Bubbly regime

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work focuses on 3D simulations of complex bubbly, cap-bubbly, and churn regimes with different bubble shapes and wide bubble size distribution. It investigates and compares various bubble interaction mechanisms of coalescence and fragmentation for the 2-Group Interfacial Area Transport Equation (IATE) model, with the assessment of two models in a CFD code for the first time. It proposes and evaluates a novel model of fragmentation and coalescence. Furthermore, it validates the models against experimental data for different configurations and regimes.
This work deals with 3D simulations of complex bubbly, cap-bubbly and churn regimes exhibiting bubbles of different shapes and with broad bubble size distribution. The first contribution of this work is to investigate and compare several bubble interaction mechanisms of coalescence and fragmentation for the 2-Group Interfacial Area Transport Equation (IATE) model. For two of these models, this is the first time their performances are assessed within a CFD code. The second contribution is to propose and assess a novel model of fragmentation and coalescence. Finally, a validation versus experimental data on three different configurations and three different regimes is performed. In particular, the interaction mechanisms are analysed for one specific regime. The implementation of the two-group IATE model has been systematically performed in the 3D NEPTUNE CFD code.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available