4.7 Review

Recapitulating the Key Advances in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of High-Grade Gliomas: Second Half of 2021 Update

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076375

Keywords

CNS; diagnosis; glioma; MRI; neuroradiology; non-imaging diagnosis; nuclear medicine; prognosis; tumor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-grade gliomas (World Health Organization grades III and IV) are the most common and deadly brain tumors, with median overall survivals of 24-72 and 14-16 months, respectively. A review of the progress in the diagnosis and prognosis of high-grade gliomas in the second half of 2021 highlighted advancements in both imaging and non-imaging diagnoses. Prognostic capacity also improved during this period. The findings suggest a higher chance of accurately diagnosing high-grade gliomas without invasive procedures, which strongly influences patient prognosis with varying survival rates.
High-grade gliomas (World Health Organization grades III and IV) are the most frequent and fatal brain tumors, with median overall survivals of 24-72 and 14-16 months, respectively. We reviewed the progress in the diagnosis and prognosis of high-grade gliomas published in the second half of 2021. A literature search was performed in PubMed using the general terms radio* and gliom* and a time limit from 1 July 2021 to 31 December 2021. Important advances were provided in both imaging and non-imaging diagnoses of these hard-to-treat cancers. Our prognostic capacity also increased during the second half of 2021. This review article demonstrates slow, but steady improvements, both scientifically and technically, which express an increased chance that patients with high-grade gliomas may be correctly diagnosed without invasive procedures. The prognosis of those patients strictly depends on the final results of that complex diagnostic process, with widely varying survival rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available