4.5 Article

Differentiation of cancer from atrial fibrillation in patients with acute multifocal stroke

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 368, Issue -, Pages 344-348

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.054

Keywords

Cancer; D-dimer; Embolism; MRI; Deep vein thrombosis; Stroke

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. Research Grant for Intractable Diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461299, 16K09685, 15K19500] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Acute multifocal embolic infarction (AMEI) is conventionally caused by etiologies such as cardioembolism due to atrial fibrillation (AO, but can also be caused by serious underlying diseases such as cancer. We characterized cancer-related AMEI and identified useful indicators for cancer-associated strokes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 35 patients with Af-related AMEI and 35 patients with cancer -related AMEI selected from 1235 consecutive patients with acute infarcts. All patients received diffusion weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Cerebral MR angiography, carotid and cardiac ultrasonography, electrocardiogram-monitoring and whole body computed tomography were also performed on these patients. D-dimer levels were evaluated on admission, and were measured during the sub-acute phase in 19 of the patients with Af and 27 of the patients with cancer. Results: Acute phase D-dimer levels were significantly higher in patients with cancer than in patients with Af alone. The cut-off D-dimer value to identify cancer-associated infarcts was 2.0 mu g/mL. D-dimer levels during the sub-acute phase remained elevated in the cancer patients. Conclusions: We may differentiate cancer-associated AMEI from Af using a D-dimer level >= 2.0 mu g/mL, which does not decrease during the sub-acute phase. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available