4.7 Article

Entangled Motifs in Membrane Protein Structures

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119193

Keywords

membrane proteins; entanglement; chirality; co-translational folding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers investigated the presence of entangled motifs in membrane protein structures and found that they occur at a similar frequency as in general proteins. However, the chirality bias of double-winding motifs is reversed in membrane proteins compared to general proteins. These observations may be explained by the differences in co-translational folding mechanisms between membrane and globular proteins.
Entangled motifs are found in one-third of protein domain structures, a reference set that contains mostly globular proteins. Their properties suggest a connection with co-translational folding. Here, we wish to investigate the presence and properties of entangled motifs in membrane protein structures. From existing databases, we build a non-redundant data set of membrane protein domains, annotated with the monotopic/transmembrane and peripheral/integral labels. We evaluate the presence of entangled motifs using the Gaussian entanglement indicator. We find that entangled motifs appear in one-fifth of transmembrane and one-fourth of monotopic proteins. Surprisingly, the main features of the distribution of the values of the entanglement indicator are similar to the reference case of general proteins. The distribution is conserved across different organisms. Differences with respect to the reference set emerge when considering the chirality of entangled motifs. Although the same chirality bias is found for single-winding motifs in both membrane and reference proteins, the bias is reversed, strikingly, for double-winding motifs only in the reference set. We speculate that these observations can be rationalized in terms of the constraints exerted on the nascent chain by the co-translational bio-genesis machinery, which is different for membrane and globular proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available