4.7 Article

Influence of Temperature Chronobiology on Stroke Outcome

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043746

Keywords

circadian rhythm; chronobiology; functional outcome; stroke; temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The circadian system has an influence on body temperature and stroke onset. This study explores the impact of temperature chronobiology on stroke onset and functional outcomes, as well as the variation of blood biomarkers based on stroke onset time.
The circadian system regulates numerous physiological variables, including body temperature. Additionally, a circadian patter has been described in stroke onset. Considering this, we hypothesised that the chronobiology of temperature may have an impact on stroke onset and functional outcomes. We also studied the variation of blood biomarkers according to stroke onset time. This is a retrospective observational study. Of the patients included, 2763 had a stroke between midnight and 8:00 h; 1571 between 8:00-14:00 h; and 655 between 14:00 h and midnight. Axillary temperature was measured at admission. At this time, blood samples were collected for biomarker analysis (TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, and glutamate). Temperature was higher in patients admitted from 8:00 h to midnight (p < 0.0001). However, the percentage of poor outcome at 3 months was highest in patients from midnight to 8:00 h (57.7%, p < 0.001). The association between temperature and mortality was highest during night time (OR: 2.79; CI 95%: 2.36-3.28; p < 0.001). These patients exhibited high glutamate (220.2 +/- 140.2 mu M), IL-6 (32.8 +/- 14.3 pg/mL) and low IL-10 (9.7 +/- 14.3 pg/mL) levels. Therefore, temperature chronobiology could have a significant impact on stroke onset and functional outcome. Superficial body hyperthermia during sleep seems to be more dangerous than during wakefulness. Further studies will be necessary to confirm our data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available