4.7 Article

Electrodeposition of carbonate-containing hydroxyapatite on carbon nanotubes/carbon fibers hybrid materials for tissue engineering application

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 4930-4935

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.055

Keywords

Carbon fiber; Carbon nanotubes; Electrodeposition; Hydroxyapatite

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51202194]
  2. FP7-International Research Staff Exchange Scheme-Advanced Bio-materials for Regenerative Medicine
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102014JCQ01030]
  4. 111 project of china [B08040]
  5. British Council
  6. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Global Innovation Initiative programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanotubes/carbon fibers hybrid materials (CCF) were used as templates to deposit carbonate-containing hydroxyapatite (CHA) by ultrasound-assisted electrodeposition method. The morphology and microstructure of CCF and CHA on CCF were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Transmission electron microscopy, Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Thermogravimetric analysis. The results showed that the CCF was composed of carbon fibers and in situ grown carbon nanotubes. The carbon nanotubes were grown along the radial direction of the carbon fibers with a straight morphology and exhibited a loose structure. The CHA enwrapped the in situ grown carbon nanotubes of CCF, then infiltrated into the loose structures of the carbon nanotubes and finally covered the CCF entirely with a particle shape. By thermogravimetric analysis, the CHA on CCF displayed more deposition weight than that on carbon fibers without carbon nanotubes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available