4.7 Review

Current Status of Cell-Based Therapies for Vitiligo

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043357

Keywords

vitiligo; keratinocytes; melanocytes; cell-based therapies; melanogenesis; cell transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vitiligo is a chronic pigmentary disease caused by the destruction of melanocytes, leading to the lack of skin coloration. The treatment of vitiligo aims at repigmentation. This review summarizes the clinical evidence for vitiligo cell-based therapies, considering the procedures, equipment, and effectiveness in repigmentation.
Vitiligo is a chronic pigmentary disease with complex etiology, the signs of which are caused by the destruction of melanocytes in the epidermis, leading to the lack of melanin pigment responsible for skin coloration. The treatment of vitiligo, which aims at repigmentation, depends both on the clinical characteristics of the disease as well as on molecular markers that may predict the response to treatment. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical evidence for vitiligo cell-based therapies taking into account the required procedures and equipment necessary to carry them out as well as their effectiveness in repigmentation, assessed using the percentage of repigmentation of the treated area. This review was conducted by assessing 55 primary clinical studies published in PubMed and ClinicalTrails.gov between 2000 and 2022. This review concludes that the extent of repigmentation, regardless of the treatment method, is highest in stable localized vitiligo patients. Moreover, therapies that combine more than one cell type, such as melanocytes and keratinocytes, or more than one method of treatment, such as the addition of NV-UVB to another treatment, increase the chances of >90% repigmentation. Lastly, this review concludes that various body parts respond differently to all treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available