4.7 Article

Endogenous Neural Stem Cell Activation after Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Modulation

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065712

Keywords

low-intensity focused ultrasound; endogenous neural stem cells; neurogenesis; fluoro-L-thymidine; Sox-2; nestin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the activation of eNSCs and adult neurogenesis after low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUS) treatment, and found that LIFUS could activate eNSCs and promote the generation of adult neurons, suggesting its potential as a treatment for neurological damage and disorders.
Endogenous neural stem cells (eNSCs) in the adult brain, which have the potential to self-renew and differentiate into functional, tissue-appropriate cell types, have raised new expectations for neurological disease therapy. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUS)-induced blood-brain barrier modulation has been reported to promote neurogenesis. Although these studies have reported improved behavioral performance and enhanced expression of brain biomarkers after LIFUS, indicating increased neurogenesis, the precise mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated eNSC activation as a mechanism for neurogenesis after LIFUS-induced blood-brain barrier modulation. We evaluated the specific eNSC markers, Sox-2 and nestin, to confirm the activation of eNSCs. We also performed 3 '-deoxy-3 '[F-18] fluoro-L-thymidine positron emission tomography ([F-18] FLT-PET) to evaluate the activation of eNSCs. The expression of Sox-2 and nestin was significantly upregulated 1 week after LIFUS. After 1 week, the upregulated expression decreased sequentially; after 4 weeks, the upregulated expression returned to that of the control group. [F-18] FLT-PET images also showed higher stem cell activity after 1 week. The results of this study indicated that LIFUS could activate eNSCs and induce adult neurogenesis. These results show that LIFUS may be useful as an effective treatment for patients with neurological damage or neurological disorders in clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available