4.5 Article

Impact of magnetic field on nanofluid thermophysical treatment within enclosure

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0217979224501960

Keywords

Stream function; alumina nanomaterial; free convection; Lorentz force; Numerical method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A numerical technique was employed to study the transport of nanofluid within a porous container, using a single-phase approach and implementing Darcy law to involve the porous term in the equation. The equation format was converted to stream function format and solved using CVFEM. The code was verified using previous data and the results showed that loading alumina increased Nu by 26.71% at Ha=0 and by 41.22% at Ha=15. Applying a magnetic field reduced Nu by 37.93% at Ra=700. Increasing the strength of the rotating cell resulted in a 38.22% increase in Nu as Ra increased. Changing the shape of alumina increased Nu by 11.73% at Ha=15 and Ra=700.
Numerical technique for examining the transport of nanofluid within the porous container has been applied. The tank has one curved hot wall which is located in the center of the outer cylinder. The single-phase approach to deriving properties of nanofluid was applied and Darcy law has been implemented to involve the porous term in the equation. The format of the equation has been converted to stream function format to remove the pressure terms and final equations were solved via CVFEM. The written code was verified according to the previous data of the published work. Outputs showed that loading alumina causes Nu to augment by 26.71% when Ha is zero and it can be increased about 41.22% when Ha = 15. Applying a magnetic field can reduce the Nu around 37.93% when Ra=700. With increase of strength of rotating cell with the rise of Ra, Nu increases by about 38.22%. Changing the shape of alumina can increase the Nu by about 11.73% when Ha=15 and Ra=700.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available