4.5 Article

Hybrid-Patch-Alex: A new patch division and deep feature extraction-based image classification model to detect COVID-19, heart failure, and other lung conditions using medical images

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ima.22914

Keywords

AlexNet; biomedical image classification; CT image classification; Hybrid-Patch-Alex; transfer learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

COVID-19, COPD, HF, and pneumonia can cause acute respiratory deterioration, and timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial. To address the issue of time consumption and bias in diagnosis, a computationally efficient deep feature engineering model, named Hybrid-Patch-Alex, was developed for automated diagnosis of COVID-19, COPD, and HF. The model achieved high accuracy rates of 99.82%, 92.90%, and 97.02% on the respective datasets using kNN and SVM classifiers.
COVID-19, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia can lead to acute respiratory deterioration. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective clinical management. Chest X-ray (CXR) and chest computed tomography (CT) are commonly used for confirming the diagnosis, but they can be time-consuming and biased. To address this, we developed a computationally efficient deep feature engineering model called Hybrid-Patch-Alex for automated COVID-19, COPD, and HF diagnosis. We utilized one CXR dataset and two CT image datasets, including a newly collected dataset with four classes: COVID-19, COPD, HF, and normal. Our model employed a hybrid patch division method, transfer learning with pre-trained AlexNet, iterative neighborhood component analysis for feature selection, and three standard classifiers (k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and artificial neural network) for automated classification. The model achieved high accuracy rates of 99.82%, 92.90%, and 97.02% on the respective datasets, using kNN and SVM classifiers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available