4.7 Article

Corrosion resistance of CrN film deposited by high-power impulse magnetron sputtering on SS304 in a simulated environment for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 48, Issue 66, Pages 25901-25917

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.265

Keywords

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Bipolar plate; High-power impulse magnetron; sputtering; Chromium nitride coating; Pulse width; Multilayer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insufficient corrosion resistance and conductivity hinder the wide application of stainless steel bipolar plates. This study explores the use of CrN monolayer and multilayer films to improve the performance of SS304 bipolar plates. The effect of pulse width on the film structure and composition was characterized, and the best performance was achieved with a single long pulse of 40 ms.
Insufficient corrosion resistance and conductivity are two major problems hindering the wide application of stainless steel (SS) bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. This study explores the use of CrN monolayer and multilayer films to improve the performance of SS304 bipolar plates, which are realized by high-power impulse magnetron sputtering with single pulse width or alternating pulse width. The effect of pulse width on the film structure and composition was characterized by various characterization techniques. Furthermore, corrosion and interfacial contact resistance (ICR) test results show that monolayer CrN film using a single long pulse of 40 ms has the lowest corrosion current density of 0.08 mA/cm2 (0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and ICR of 3.15 mU cm2 in all coated samples. As the pulse width increases, vacancy-like defects in film decrease and the density increases, which is attribute to high bombardment flux and high average power of long pulse during deposition. & COPY; 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available