4.7 Article

Investigation the Ni0•9Cu0•1TiO3-d reforming layer for direct ethanol solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 48, Issue 49, Pages 18871-18878

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.359

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cell; Ethanol; Catalytic reforming layer; Coking resistance; Ni0; 9Cu0; 1TiO3-$

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Ni0.9Cu0.1 TiO3-$ catalytic reforming layer is coated on the traditional Ni-based anode of solid oxide fuel cells using ethanol as fuel. The reforming layer decomposes into Ni-Cu alloy and TiO2 under reducing atmosphere, which greatly improves the coking resistance performance of the anode. The cells with Ni0.9Cu0.1TiO3-$ layer exhibit excellent electrocatalytic performance, with a maximum power density of 867 mW cm-2 at 800 degrees C. It also demonstrates good coking resistance and electrocatalytic activity in the 50-hour stability test.
When the solid oxide fuel cell uses ethanol as fuel, it is highly prone to cause carbon deposition and cell failure in the traditional Ni-based ceramic anode. Herein, Ni0.9Cu0.1 TiO3-$ catalytic reforming layer is coated on the surface of the traditional Ni-based anode to address this issue. It has been shown that the reforming layer of Ni0.9Cu0.1TiO3-$ decomposes into Ni-Cu alloy and TiO2 under reducing atmosphere, which significantly improves the coking resistance performance of the anode. Cells with Ni0.9Cu0.1TiO3-$ layer have excellent electrocatalytic performance, and the maximum power density can reach 867 mW cm-2 at 800 degrees C using ethanol as fuel. Moreover, it doesn't show significant degradation in the 50h stability test, proving that the Ni0.9Cu0.1TiO3-$ reforming layer has good coking resistance performance and electrocatalytic activity when used in direct ethanol solid oxide fuel cells. (c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available