4.5 Article

Impact of elicitation and drying methods on biological activities of lovage essential oil

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 7, Pages 3648-3657

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.16464

Keywords

Anti-acetylcholinesterase activity; antimicrobial; antioxidant; elicitation; essential oils; lovage (Levisticum officinale Koch)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quality of essential oils depends on the optimized drying methods. The highest yield of essential oils was obtained from plants elicited with 0.1% yeast extract and dried traditionally. (Z)-ligustilide, alpha-terpinyl acetate, and beta-phellandrene were the main compounds identified in the samples. The most effective antioxidant activity was found in the sample obtained from plants elicited with 0.1% yeast extract and freeze-dried.
The quality of essential oils (EOs) was dependent on the optimised methods of drying. The highest yield of EOs was noted in plants elicited with 0.1% yeast extract (YE) and dried with the traditional method (1.4 mL 100 g dw(-1)); it was over twice as high as the yield of the control sample (0.58 mL 100 g dw(-1)). (Z)-ligustilide, alpha-terpinyl acetate and beta-phellandrene were the main compounds identified in the samples. The most effective antioxidant activity was exhibited by the sample obtained from plants elicited with 0.1% YE and subjected to freeze-drying. The highest RP and LPO inhibition were determined in samples obtained from plants subjected to jasmonic acid (JA) elicitation and freeze-drying (1.85 and 1.02 mu L mL(-1) respectively). The use of 0.1% JA and microwave-drying was the most effective for inhibition of LOXI activity. The highest acetylcholinesterase inhibition was noted in the freeze-dried sample obtained from plants elicited with YE (86.39 kIU mL(-1)). The samples exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against L. monocytogenes BBA-2660.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available