4.5 Article

Effect of chitin, chitosan and NaCMC biopolymers on the consistency limits of organic silt

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-023-05022-4

Keywords

Organic soil; Liquid limit; Plasticity index; Chitin; Chitosan; Cellulose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the effect of three biopolymers (chitin, chitosan, and NaCMC) on the consistency limits of low plasticity organic silt soil. The results show that the consistency limits increased with increasing dosage of biopolymer additives, with NaCMC having a more significant effect. The bridging effect of the additives improved soil strength properties, leading to a significant increase in liquid limit.
With global concerns on carbon emissions, there is increased need for various eco-friendly alternatives to conventional (cement and lime) additives used in ground improvement applications. This paper investigates the effect of three biopolymers-chitin, chitosan, and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (NaCMC)-on the consistency limits of low plasticity organic silt soil. The theory of soil mechanics suggests that understanding the soil's plasticity nature is helpful in predicting strength and compressibility characteristics. The variation in the Casagrande liquid limit (LL), plastic limit (PL), plasticity index, and flow index of the soil are presented for 0.5-4% chitin and chitosan dosages, and 0.25-1% NaCMC dosage. For all three biopolymers, the consistency limits (more-so for LL than PL) increased with increasing dosage, with NaCMC addition producing a more dramatic effect compared to chitin and chitosan additions. The biopolymer additives formed 'bridge' connections between the soil particles, helping to improve strength properties. This bridging effect explains the significant increases in LL (being essentially a strength-based parameter) for biopolymer addition. A greater LL increase was observed for NaCMC addition since it is a gellable biopolymer with moisture retaining property.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available