Efficacy and safety of biological agents for pemphigoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Biologic agents (also termed biologics) have become an important adjuvant-targeted treatment option in autoimmune blistering disease. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of newly licensed biologics for the management of pemphigoid using a meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies involving pemphigoid patients treated with biological agents (rituximab, dupilumab, omalizumab, or mepolizumab) were searched. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the short-term efficacy, adverse event (AE), relapse, and long-term survival. A total of seven studies involving 296 patients were identified. The pooled RRs for short-term effectiveness, AE, relapse, and long-term survival rate in patients treated with biological agents versus systemic corticosteroids were 1.37 (95% CI 0.95-1.97; I-2 = 82%; P = 0.09), 0.54 (95% CI 0.39-0.73; I-2 = 13%; P = 0.005), 1.36 (95% CI 0.95-1.96; I-2 = 16.8%; P = 0.19), and 1.08 (95% CI 0.95-1.21; I-2 = 48.1%; P = 0.53), respectively. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis revealed that the RRs of efficacy were 2.10 (95% CI 1.61-2.75; I-2 = 0%; P < 0.00001) for rituximab and 2.07 (95% CI 1.61-2.67; I-2 = 0%; P < 0.00001) for sample size greater than 30. Compared with conventional therapy, biologics treatment was significantly associated with fewer adverse events (P < 0.05), but no significant differences were found for efficacy and relapse (P > 0.05). The findings demonstrate that a biologics-containing regimen could minimize the occurrence of AEs and might display a comparable efficacy and recurrence to that of receiving systemic corticosteroids.

Automated summary

Biologic agents have become an important treatment option for autoimmune blistering diseases. A meta-analysis showed that treatment with biologics had fewer adverse events compared to systemic corticosteroids, with similar efficacy and recurrence rates.