4.1 Article

Contrasting Impacts of Developing Phases of Two Types of El Nino on Southern China Rainfall

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 359-370

Publisher

METEOROLOGICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2016-019

Keywords

EP El Nino; CP El Nino; rainfall; southern China

Funding

  1. 973 Program [2013CB430200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41475076]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015KJJCB07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential influence of the developing phases of the two types of El Nino (i.e., EP El Nino and CP El Nino) on rainfall over southern China was investigated using observational data sets from 1979 to 2008. The developing phases of the CP El Nino events are associated with enhanced rainfall over southern China during summer, whereas the influence is not significant in autumn. During the developing phases of the EP El Nino events, rainfall significantly increases over southern China during autumn but no significant increases are observed in summer. These increases in rainfall are a result of the circulation anomalies associated with the two types of El Nino events. The western Pacific subtropical high (WPSH) shifts northeastward during developing phases of the CP El Nino events in summer and is accompanied by enhanced convection and ascending flow. The WPSH shifts westward during the developing phases of the EP El Nino events in autumn and is associated with anomalous southwesterlies over southern China. These circulation anomalies favor more rainfall in southern China. No significant circulation anomalies occur during the developing phases of the CP El Nino events in autumn or the EP El Nino events in summer. These results highlight the importance of considering their developing phases when investigating effects of these two types of El Nino events on climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available