4.7 Review

Applications of chitosan-based biomaterials: From preparation to spinal cord injury neuroprosthetic treatment

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123447

Keywords

Chitosan; Spinal cord injury; Biomaterials; Drug delivery system; Nerve tissue engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal cord injury (SCI)-related disabilities are a serious problem that needs urgent treatment. Chitosan-based biomaterials have proven to be effective in promoting SCI repair by promoting neural cell growth, guiding nerve tissue regeneration, delivering nerve growth factors, and serving as a vector for gene therapy. This review aims to introduce recent advances in chitosan-based biomaterials for SCI treatment and highlight their prospects for further application.
Spinal cord injury (SCI)-related disabilities are a serious problem in the modern society. Further, the treatment of SCI is highly challenging and is urgently required in clinical practice. Research on nerve tissue engineering is an emerging approach for improving the treatment outcomes of SCI. Chitosan (CS) is a cationic polysaccharide derived from natural biomaterials. Chitosan has been found to exhibit excellent biological properties, such as nontoxicity, biocompatibility, biodegradation, and antibacterial activity. Recently, chitosan-based biomaterials have attracted significant attention for SCI repair in nerve tissue engineering applications. These studies revealed that chitosan-based biomaterials have various functions and mechanisms to promote SCI repair, such as promoting neural cell growth, guiding nerve tissue regeneration, delivering nerve growth factors, and as a vector for gene therapy. Chitosan-based biomaterials have proven to have excellent potential for the treatment of SCI. This review aims to introduce the recent advances in chitosan-based biomaterials for SCI treatment and to highlight the prospects for further application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available