4.5 Article

Experimental characterization and modelling of adhesive bonded joints under static and non-monotonic fracture loading in the mode II regime

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103394

Keywords

Double lap shear joint; Metals; Imperfect interface model; Damage evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding and predicting the behavior of bonded joints under different loading conditions is crucial. This study investigates the shear behavior of double lap shear bonded joints under static and cyclic loading and presents a method for predicting their behavior using an imperfect interface model. The numerical results are in good agreement with the experimental results, providing a valuable design tool for adhesive structures.
Understanding and predicting the behaviour of bonded joints under different loading conditions is certainly an aspect of primary importance. Although numerous experimental studies have been carried out over the last few decades, the shear behaviour of bonded joints under cyclic loading has not been investigated in detail. To fill this gap, an extensive experimental and numerical program of double lap shear bonded joints has been carried out. The double lap shear joints were tested under static and cyclic loading to evaluate and compare the influence of external forces on the adhesive performance. The results are discussed in terms of the force-displacement rela-tionship, shear stress, stiffness, residual displacement, and initial damage. Finally, a method is presented for predicting the actual behaviour of double lap shear bonded joints under different loading conditions using an imperfect interface model with damage evolution. The numerical results are in good agreement with the experimental results for all loading conditions. This work has provided and validated an interesting design tool for adhesive structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available