4.7 Article

Complex evaporation kinetics of a volatile droplet of methanol

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106741

Keywords

Sessile drop; Methanol evaporation; High liquid volatility; Wetting area; Retraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental study investigates the evaporation phenomenon of a highly volatile methanol drop. The study uses optical techniques to observe the drop's shape evolution and determine its geometric parameters. The results show three distinct stages of evaporation: fast evaporation, formation of a thin liquid film and subsequent retraction of the drop, and slow evaporation accompanied by changes in contact angle and wetting area.
An experimental study is carried out to investigate the different stages of the evaporation phenomenon of a methanol drop that exhibits a complex behavior because of its high volatility. An optical technique is employed with top and side view cameras; it allows to follow the drop shape evolution and determine the geometric parameters: contact angle and base diameter from which the volume of the droplet is computed. The outcomes of this study show three distinct stages. First, the evaporation kinetics is very fast (33% of the droplet lifetime) where 85% of the volume evaporates with a nearly pinned contact line. It is followed by a short stage (12% of lifetime) where 8% of the volume evaporates. In this stage, the drop forms a thin liquid film followed by a motion of the contact line in which the drop retracts. The wetting surface deforms and loses its quasi-circular shape. Then, the wetting area shrinks drastically to form a smaller droplet with a higher contact angle. In the third stage (55% of lifetime), the 7% remaining drop volume evaporates with a low evaporation rate accompanied by a strong decrease of contact angle and a slight decline of wetting area until total evaporation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available